Thursday, May 30, 2019
Waiting for Godot is Not an Absurdist Play :: Waiting for Godot Essays
Waiting for Godot is Not an Absurdist Play   Samuel  Becketts stage plays are gray both in color and in subject matter. Likewise,  the answer to the question of whether or not Becketts work is Absurdist also belongs to  that realm of gray in which Beckett often works. The Absurdist label becomes  tough when applied to  Beckett because his dramatic works tend to overflow the boundaries which scholars attempt to  assign. When discussing Beckett, the critic inevitably becomes entangled in contradiction. The  playwrights own denial that there is a philosophical system behind the plays and his explicit refusal to  reduce them to codified interpretations suggests, one could argue, that to search for such systems  or interpretations in Becketts work is, at best, a fruitless  enterprise (Beckett quoted. in McMillan 13). Let  me suggest, however, that Becketts own statements and criticisms not be taken as a deterrent to the  study of his work. His objections threaten only those interpretation   s which reduce his work. The  challenge for the critic, then, is to  measure out and analyze Beckett in such a way that his works are not  reduced but enhanced. The problem with designating Becketts work as Absurdist is, precisely, that  this interpretation reduces his work. When a critic describes a work as Absurd, she does not  simply mean that the work is outrageous or nonsensical or merely silly. Coined by American critic  Martin Esslin, the term theater of the Absurd can be defined as a kind of drama that presents a view of the  absurdity of the  gracious condition by the abandoning of usual or rational devices and by the use of nonrealistic form....Conceived in  perplexity and spiritual anguish, the theater of the absurd portrays not a serial publication of connected incidents  telling a story but a pattern of images presenting people as bewildered beings in an incomprehensible  universe. (Holman 2) In the introduction to The  study of the Absurd, Martin Esslin provides a  com   prehensive explanation of Absurdist theater. He quotes Albert Camus jThe Myth of Sisyphus A world that can be explained by reasoning, however faulty, is a familiar  world. But in a universe that is suddenly deprived of illusions and of light, man feels a stranger. His is  an irremediable exile, because he is deprived of memories of a lost homeland as much as he lacks the  hope of a promised   
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.